Clause 17.
C.
Substitute "Judge" for "Court" in lines 1 and 4.
marks in margin of the
Chief Justice.
Add at the end of the clause the following:-
"Such application shall be made in
Chambers to a single Judge of the
Supreme Court unless the Judge directs
it to be heard in Court on a report
from the Registrar that all the
conditions have been complied with,
and the costs of the attendance on
such application of any party other
than the appellant or his solicitor
shall not be allowed unless the Judge
certify there was reasonable ground
for such attendance."
far as my experience
1008
I cannot see the
e of two applications
o the Court, because this
means two briefs to counsel, and only adds to the costs. The Rules how-
ever contemplate conditional and final leave to
appeal. I therefore put this forward only as a suggestion for consideration.
The amendment is inserted to meet the wishes
of the Chief Justice in paragraph 3 of his
letter of the 3rd instant. The application
in Chambers would naturally lie to one
Judge. The rule as amended will not, I think,
conflict with the definition of "Court" in
clause 1.
(Sd.) V. Rees Davies.
24.11.08.
Page 68
Feb.
Var.
ra
©y!!!
de of soldout “aldo art to toddef ode nort JoaT DET
.800r ༣
¿^edriswol b- to
Clause 17.
C.
Substitute "Judge" for "Court" in lines 1 and 4.
marks in margin of the
Chief Justice.
Add at the end of the clause the following:-
A mot sottogrp ede morc
ofs tid 88.' +I”
est vttunen wild madte,duo” në mbart ad * roddetti:s bronse
t
*** :lents of evam! not Isbro fent? a niszɗo of
qu dug need
Paws = "mkristen rebro Istotelrong" a heffen maled rabro Iamtaka
Abiro binoda abro won elt Anbild I bre
It matad van tollalou ati #313 visdInktob
not ɛtedmelu otež qu 'my mes neuf qffamosa odd dat andetne
of Bolzon to mob ad humda shff .ogburk suit to "ahyu Isla
salto add to moriation aid to son/haarde snt and ¡able Yeildo wit
at 9*
en sing tot beftianao ed com himo:fe #imɗrts.(0) ni eblɛ
„**t not ba: arm side'oBeat B
far as my experience
1008
I cannot see the
e of two applications
o the Court, because this
sans two briefs to ounsel, and only adds to he Costs. The Rules how- aver contemplate condi- tional and final leave to
real. I therefore put this brward only as a suppest- ion for consideration.
"Such application shall be nade in
Chambers to a single "Judge of the
Supreme Court unless the Judge directs
it to be heard in Court on a report
from the Registrar that all the
conditions have been complied with,
and the costs of the attendance on
such application of any party other
than the appellant or his solicitor
shall not be allowed unless the Judge
certify there was reasonable ground
for such attendance."
The amendment is inserted to meet the wishes
of the Chief Justice in paragraph 3 of his
letter of the 3rd. instant. The application
in Chambers would naturally lie to one
Judgo. The rule as amended will not I think
conflict with the definition of "Court" in
clause 1.
(Sd.) V. Rees Davies.
24.11.08.
68
Feb.
Var.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.